Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) · Texas

South Coast Terminals - WRF

Houston, TX · ~73 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

South Coast Terminals - WRF runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) workplace, earning a grade A.

South Coast Terminals - WRF: 1.0 TCR = 17% of Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS 5.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

South Coast Terminals - WRF safety composite

South Coast Terminals - WRF scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2017→2021

South Coast Terminals - WRF injury rate improved

South Coast Terminals - WRF's TCR fell 1.3 from 1.3 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493190 · Houston, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #19/76
  • PHOTO Bessemer AT&T
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bessemer AT&T (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

South Coast Terminals - WRF in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows South Coast Terminals - WRF averages 1.0 TCR (17% of the Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

South Coast Terminals - WRF TCR series: 2017=1.3 · 2018=0 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=0 · BLS 5.8

Where South Coast Terminals - WRF falls in its industry

453 Private warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 82% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 76 Private warehousing and storag employers in Texas.

South Coast Terminals - WRF (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate South Coast Terminals - WRF
South Coast Terminals - WRF (73 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 2.7

South Coast Terminals - WRF has more employees than the Private warehousing and storage (except median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.3 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493190 · TX · Houston

453 Private warehousing and storage (except farm products, general merchandise, refrigerated) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 5,116 employers in Houston, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bessemer AT&T 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR LSIM 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 700 Distribution Dr (fka 680), Atlanta, GA 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR International Matex Tank Terminals-St Rose 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eden Green Technology 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Treesap Farms LLC - Mill Creek 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE T-Rey Properties Inc. 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - South District Houston 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH IAH 11,560 FTE
CITY-NEAR IAH - Airport United Airlines Offices 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-IAH 9,442 FTE
CITY-NEAR Houston Methodist Hospital Texas Medical Center 8,873 FTE
NAT-TCR Triton Health Systems, L.L.C. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Colorado Operations (Frederick, CO) 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR RLA Investments Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Local Fleet 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Milford Public Schools Hill and Plain 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Rosemount Park & Recreation 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Summit Reconstruction and Restoration 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sutter Medical Foundation (185-235) 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.