Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · Pennsylvania

Bethlehem Energy Center

Bethlehem, PA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bethlehem Energy Center runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Bethlehem Energy Center: 0.7 TCR = 61% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bethlehem Energy Center safety composite

Bethlehem Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bethlehem Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Bethlehem Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Bethlehem, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/46
  • PHOTO Woodsdale Generating…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Woodsdale Generating Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bethlehem Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bethlehem Energy Center averages 0.7 TCR (61% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bethlehem Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=3.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Bethlehem Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 46 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in Pennsylvania.

Bethlehem Energy Center (28 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bethlehem Energy Center
Bethlehem Energy Center (28 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Bethlehem Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · PA · Bethlehem

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 358 employers in Bethlehem, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Woodsdale Generating Station 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bay Shore 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prairie State Generating Company - Power Block 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cane Run 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Masda Mushroom LLC 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scenery Hill 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Production Fire and Safety LLC., DBA Ampro Strategic Alliance PA 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lackawanna Energy Center 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Hospital 5,338 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Physician's Group 3,041 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Muhlenberg 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4087 2,105 FTE
NAT-TCR MEJA Construction, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Timberlake Construction Co. Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store #7 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Office 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pastoria Energy Facility 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Russell City Energy Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vcf 029 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE 06 Grand Rapids 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.