Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · California

Pastoria Energy Facility

Lebec, CA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pastoria Energy Facility runs at 66% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Pastoria Energy Facility: 0.8 TCR = 66% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pastoria Energy Facility safety composite

Pastoria Energy Facility scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pastoria Energy Facility held a steady TCR band

Pastoria Energy Facility's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Lebec, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 66% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/41
  • PHOTO Gaston Steam Plant -…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gaston Steam Plant - APC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pastoria Energy Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pastoria Energy Facility averages 0.8 TCR (66% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pastoria Energy Facility TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.5 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Pastoria Energy Facility falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 41 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in California.

Pastoria Energy Facility (28 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pastoria Energy Facility
Pastoria Energy Facility (28 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Pastoria Energy Facility has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.6 3.6 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.5 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Lebec

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 9 employers in Lebec, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gaston Steam Plant - APC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eddystone 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR JH Campbell 1&2 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Generation Fossil Greene County Steam Plant 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 477 2,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR IKEA #345 Tejon 592 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lebec DC 451 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-Lebec-Dollar General 47 FTE
NAT-TCR OnTrack, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR E.T. MacKenzie Company 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR THSC - Corporate Office 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR JONESBORO 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 029 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgantown 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keokuk/HMW 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.