Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation · California

Russell City Energy Center

Hayward, CA · ~28 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Russell City Energy Center runs at 64% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation workplace, earning a grade B.

Russell City Energy Center: 0.8 TCR = 64% of Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Russell City Energy Center safety composite

Russell City Energy Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Russell City Energy Center held a steady TCR band

Russell City Energy Center's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Hayward, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 64% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/41
  • PHOTO Acadia Power Station
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Acadia Power Station (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Russell City Energy Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Russell City Energy Center averages 0.8 TCR (64% of the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Russell City Energy Center TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Russell City Energy Center falls in its industry

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 41 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Gen employers in California.

Russell City Energy Center (28 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Russell City Energy Center
Russell City Energy Center (28 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Russell City Energy Center has fewer employees than the Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.5 3.5 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 3.4 3.4 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · CA · Hayward

846 Fossil Fuel Electric Power Generation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 336 employers in Hayward, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Acadia Power Station 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Enchanted Rock 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Klamath Energy LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Segs Harper Lake Solar Plant 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 518 2,891 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 100 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 117 2,817 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Rose Hospital 929 FTE
NAT-TCR Vcf 049 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Midland Packaging and Display 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Bates Engineers 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Valero Renewable Fuels Company, LLC dba Valero Aurora Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Vcf 029 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bethlehem Energy Center 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Morgantown 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Keokuk/HMW 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.