Health program administration · Michigan

Michigan Public Health Institute

Okemos, MI · ~804 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Michigan Public Health Institute runs at 16% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Health program administration workplace, earning a grade A.

Michigan Public Health Institute: 0.5 TCR = 16% of Health program administration BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Michigan Public Health Institute safety composite

Michigan Public Health Institute scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Michigan Public Health Institute held a steady TCR band

Michigan Public Health Institute's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.5 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.4× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 923120 · Okemos, MI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 16% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Itasca County Health…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~804 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Itasca County Health & Human Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Michigan Public Health Institute in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Michigan Public Health Institute averages 0.5 TCR (16% of the Health program administration BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Michigan Public Health Institute TCR series: 2016=0.5 · 2017=0.5 · 2018=1.1 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.7 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 3.2

Where Michigan Public Health Institute falls in its industry

267 Health program administration establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Health program administration employers in Michigan.

Michigan Public Health Institute (804 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Michigan Public Health Institute
Michigan Public Health Institute (804 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Michigan Public Health Institute has more employees than the Health program administration median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.2 3 0 0
2023 0.7 0.1 4 2 0
2022 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2021 0.3 0.1 2 1 0
2020 0.5 0.2 2 1 0
2018 1.1 0.4 4 1 0
2017 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2016 0.5 0.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

923120 · MI · Okemos

267 Health program administration employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 40 employers in Okemos, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Itasca County Health & Human Services 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Health Department 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benton County - Human Services 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hyattsville 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DET2 804 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spartan Motors, Inc. 805 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON AERO MI 808 FTE
STATE-SIZE Accident Fund Holdings Inc. 808 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ingham County Medical Care Facility 372 FTE
CITY-NEAR Meijer Inc 316 FTE
CITY-NEAR 025 - Okemos 282 FTE
CITY-NEAR TechSmith Corporation 272 FTE
NAT-TCR Kiel Thomson Company 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR PTC Admin 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR UPMC Health Plan 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Securitec One, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Diamond Pharmacy Services 804 FTE
NAT-SIZE IL - Northlake 804 FTE
NAT-SIZE AES Electric LLC DBA Freestate Electric 804 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aztem - Tempe 804 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.