Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Iowa

Bickford of Sioux City I

Sioux City, IA · ~25 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bickford of Sioux City I runs at 469% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bickford of Sioux City I: 17.8 TCR = 469% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bickford of Sioux City I safety composite

Bickford of Sioux City I scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

16/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 35.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bickford of Sioux City I: 0.0 → 35.5 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 71.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.99× in 2021

Bickford of Sioux City I's TCR rose 35.5 from 0.0 in 2018 to 35.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 71.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sioux City, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.8 · 469% of ind

  • DART 35.5 DART
  • RANK #102/121
  • PHOTO Bickford of Lancaster
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~25 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bickford of Lancaster (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Bickford of Sioux City I in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bickford of Sioux City I averages 17.8 TCR (469% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bickford of Sioux City I TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=71.8 · 2021=35.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Bickford of Sioux City I falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #102 safest of 121 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Iowa.

Bickford of Sioux City I (25 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bickford of Sioux City I
Bickford of Sioux City I (25 employees, TCR 17.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bickford of Sioux City I has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 35.5 35.5 0 7 0
2020 71.8 59.8 2 10 0
2019 17.9 0.0 3 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IA · Sioux City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 259 employers in Sioux City, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Lancaster 17.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR American House - Jenison 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Addison of Pleasant Prairie 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bell Tower Retirement Community 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE WCT-Crystal Lake 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oskaloosa Service Center 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midland Power 25 FTE
STATE-SIZE Consumers Energy 25 FTE
CITY-NEAR Seaboard Triumph Foods 2,375 FTE
CITY-NEAR SeaboardTriumph Foods 1,896 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Luke's Regional Medical Center 1,201 FTE
CITY-NEAR Smithfield Packaged Meats Corp 691 FTE
NAT-TCR Bickford of Lancaster 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LAS - Ground Ops 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Emerald Meadows 17.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 4186-DC208 17.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE SCT of Ohio, Inc. 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Granite City Fire Department 1 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE ATLSD - Springhill Suites Atlanta 25 FTE
NAT-SIZE Smith Corners 25 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.