Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, mowing, seeding, spraying) · Ohio

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing

Bellefontaine, OH · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, mowing, seeding, spraying) workplace, earning a grade C.

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, mowing, seeding, spraying) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing safety composite

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

82/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−95.2

2022→2023

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing injury rate improved

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing's TCR fell 95.2 from 95.2 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 95.2 TCR.

2022=95.2 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Bellefontaine, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/215
  • PHOTO Baker Landscape Corp
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baker Landscape Corp (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, mowing, seeding, spraying) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing TCR series: 2022=95.2 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing falls in its industry

2,875 Lawn care services (e.g., fert establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 215 Lawn care services (e.g., fert employers in Ohio.

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing
Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing (34 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Big Greens Lawn Service and SnowPlowing has fewer employees than the Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, m median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 95.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · OH · Bellefontaine

2,875 Lawn care services (e.g., fertilizing, mowing, seeding, spraying) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 38 employers in Bellefontaine, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baker Landscape Corp 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 057 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rotolo Consultants Inc 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sequoias Tree Expert LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE CENT-ROLL PRODUCTS 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE HG066 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Protein Specialists Company 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Liberty Technology 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mary Rutan Hospital 720 FTE
CITY-NEAR AGC Automotive Americas 572 FTE
CITY-NEAR AGC Automotive Glass Plant 493 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1264 339 FTE
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carbro Constructors Corp Main 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Lots Store #5323 North Bergen, NJ 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sierra Ridge Memory Care 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Webster-Morrisania Houses 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sack-Wern 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.