Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) · North Carolina

Big V Property Group Charlotte

Charlotte, NC · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
1.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Big V Property Group Charlotte runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) workplace, earning a grade B.

Big V Property Group Charlotte: 0.8 TCR = 57% of Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) BLS 1.4 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Big V Property Group Charlotte safety composite

Big V Property Group Charlotte scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Big V Property Group Charlotte: 0.0 → 2.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 2.4 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2022

Big V Property Group Charlotte's TCR rose 2.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 2.4 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 531120 · Charlotte, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 0.8 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #2/7
  • PHOTO Grapevine Mills
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grapevine Mills (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Big V Property Group Charlotte in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Big V Property Group Charlotte averages 0.8 TCR (57% of the Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Big V Property Group Charlotte TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.4 · BLS 1.4

Where Big V Property Group Charlotte falls in its industry

302 Lessors of nonresidential buil establishments

Safer than 85% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 7 Lessors of nonresidential buil employers in North Carolina.

Big V Property Group Charlotte (34 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Big V Property Group Charlotte
Big V Property Group Charlotte (34 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Big V Property Group Charlotte has fewer employees than the Lessors of nonresidential buildings (exc median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 2.4 0.0 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

531120 · NC · Charlotte

302 Lessors of nonresidential buildings (except miniwarehouses) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grapevine Mills 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inland Los Angeles 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prologis - Cerritos Office 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Market Center Management Company 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2778 NC 50 South, Benson, NC 27504 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Natural Gas 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iredell Operations Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Main Office - 01 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Landsberg Houston 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Frankstown 20039 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Holzer Therapy and Wellness 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE V.J. Scozzari and Sons, Inc. Hopewell 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gear Motions - Nixon Gear Division 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Washington Crane & Hoist 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE K&M Tire Minneapolis 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.