Sawmills · Pennsylvania

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division

St. Mary'S, PA · ~23 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sawmills workplace, earning a grade F.

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division: 6.9 TCR = 209% of Sawmills BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division safety composite

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2016→2024

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division injury rate improved

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.1 · 2017=12.0 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321113 · St. Mary'S, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #26/47
  • PHOTO UFP Industrial LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: UFP Industrial LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division averages 6.9 TCR (209% of the Sawmills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division TCR series: 2016=4.1 · 2017=12 · 2018=8.9 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=9.4 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=5.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division falls in its industry

905 Sawmills establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #26 safest of 47 Sawmills employers in Pennsylvania.

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division (23 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division
Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division (23 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.2

Bingaman & Son Lumber, St. Mary's Lumber Division has fewer employees than the Sawmills median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.4 5.4 1 0 0
2022 10.4 5.2 2 0 0
2020 9.4 0.0 2 0 0
2019 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2018 8.9 8.9 2 0 0
2017 12.0 4.0 3 0 0
2016 4.1 4.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321113 · PA · St. Mary'S

905 Sawmills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR UFP Industrial LLC 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilkins, Kaiser & Olsen, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Biewer Sawmill Lake City 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR T&R Lumber Company 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Mt. Parnell Fisheries Co. 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hickory Run Energy, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE CPV Fairview LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. - Corporate Office 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Penn Pallet Inc 82 FTE
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Los Angeles Gateway - Torrance 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Ernst Concrete Columbus 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeside Plastics, INC 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR San Francisco 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 01 Metro West 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sylacauga Alabama Plant 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rapp Road 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monical's Pizza Rantoul 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.