Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · District of Columbia

Bladensburg Facility

Washington, DC · ~664 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bladensburg Facility runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Bladensburg Facility: 11.5 TCR = 256% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bladensburg Facility safety composite

Bladensburg Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bladensburg Facility: 9.6 → 10.1 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 14.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.86× in 2022

Bladensburg Facility's TCR rose 0.5 from 9.6 in 2016 to 10.1 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2017 at 14.3 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 256% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #7/8
  • PHOTO Division 24
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 400 inj
  • SIZE ~664 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Division 24 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

Bladensburg Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bladensburg Facility averages 11.5 TCR (256% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bladensburg Facility TCR series: 2016=9.6 · 2017=14.3 · 2018=13.3 · 2019=12.1 · 2020=7.6 · 2021=13.6 · 2022=10.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Bladensburg Facility falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 8 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in District of Columbia.

Bladensburg Facility (664 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bladensburg Facility
Bladensburg Facility (664 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Bladensburg Facility has more employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 10.1 9.9 38 18 0
2021 13.6 13.0 50 23 0
2020 7.6 7.4 30 6 0
2019 12.1 11.2 71 12 0
2018 13.3 11.8 70 23 0
2017 14.3 13.7 87 4 0
2016 9.6 9.3 54 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · DC · Washington

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Division 24 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metro Transit Transfer Road 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4131 POWER MAINTENANCE 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Transit District 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Patroit Plaza III 675 FTE
STATE-SIZE 26253 WASHINGTON HILTON 638 FTE
STATE-SIZE Baker DC, LLC 628 FTE
STATE-SIZE Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority - Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport 702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Friendship Villa & WEL-Home Health Miles City 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Bakery Express of Central FL 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 357245-Roslyn Heights Po 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR SmithCo MFG 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE LBCLTXHV - AT&T Mobility Services LLC 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCRMCA73 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE Friendship Retirement Community 664 FTE
NAT-SIZE PVH Corp. 664 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.