Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · California

Division 24

Monrovia, CA · ~175 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Division 24 runs at 256% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Division 24: 11.5 TCR = 256% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Division 24 safety composite

Division 24 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Division 24: 9.6 → 10.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 15.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.78× in 2024

Division 24's TCR rose 1.3 from 9.6 in 2017 to 10.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.78× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · Monrovia, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 256% of ind

  • DART 8.9 DART
  • RANK #56/75
  • PHOTO Bladensburg Facility
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 116 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bladensburg Facility (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Division 24 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Division 24 averages 11.5 TCR (256% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Division 24 TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2019=15.8 · 2020=11.2 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=11 · 2023=12.4 · 2024=10.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Division 24 falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 75 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in California.

Division 24 (175 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Division 24
Division 24 (175 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Division 24 has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.9 8.9 24 4 0
2023 12.4 10.2 17 11 0
2022 11.0 7.2 15 5 0
2021 9.5 5.7 7 8 0
2020 11.2 9.2 16 1 0
2019 15.8 9.6 24 9 0
2017 9.6 9.6 13 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · CA · Monrovia

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 68 employers in Monrovia, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bladensburg Facility 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metro Transit Transfer Road 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4131 POWER MAINTENANCE 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Transit District 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE SANTA BARBARA FARMS, LLC 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bradcon LLC dba: Bradley Concrete 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Syserco, Inc. 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI:CC023 - CC023 -McClellan Park, CA 175 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 593 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monrovia 02 Oral Care 695 FTE
CITY-NEAR WorleyParsons Group Inc - Monrovia 530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Original Tommy's 500 FTE
NAT-TCR TXD013 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WAS027 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Elkhart Office 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Mille Lacs Health System - Lake Song 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Administration Building and Water Quality Lab 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reno 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE ShopRite Of West Nyack # 288 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Poly Packaging, Inc. 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.