Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) · Minnesota

Metro Transit Transfer Road

St Paul, MN · ~108 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.5
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Metro Transit Transfer Road runs at 255% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) workplace, earning a grade F.

Metro Transit Transfer Road: 11.5 TCR = 255% of Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Metro Transit Transfer Road safety composite

Metro Transit Transfer Road scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 24.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Metro Transit Transfer Road: 8.3 → 25.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 25.7 TCR · DART/TCR 2.17× in 2020

Metro Transit Transfer Road's TCR rose 17.4 from 8.3 in 2017 to 25.7 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 2.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485111 · St Paul, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.5 · 255% of ind

  • DART 24.9 DART
  • RANK #17/18
  • PHOTO 4131 POWER MAINTENANCE
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~108 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 4131 POWER MAINTENANCE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Metro Transit Transfer Road in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Metro Transit Transfer Road averages 11.5 TCR (255% of the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Metro Transit Transfer Road TCR series: 2017=8.3 · 2018=6.5 · 2019=5.3 · 2020=25.7 · BLS 4.5

Where Metro Transit Transfer Road falls in its industry

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e. establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #17 safest of 18 Mixed mode transit systems (e. employers in Minnesota.

Metro Transit Transfer Road (108 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Metro Transit Transfer Road
Metro Transit Transfer Road (108 employees, TCR 11.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 217 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Metro Transit Transfer Road has fewer employees than the Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 25.7 24.9 25 7 0
2019 5.3 5.3 6 0 0
2018 6.5 5.6 7 0 0
2017 8.3 6.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485111 · MN · St Paul

421 Mixed mode transit systems (e.g., bus, commuter rail, subway combinations) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 230 employers in St Paul, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 4131 POWER MAINTENANCE 11.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Division 24 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bladensburg Facility 11.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Transit District 11.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Gordon Construction of Mahnomen, Inc 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kraemer North America - MN All Others 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gartner Refrigeration 108 FTE
STATE-SIZE Main 108 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1010 REGIONS HOSPITAL 5,313 FTE
CITY-NEAR HPI-Ramsey 5,183 FTE
CITY-NEAR Travelers St Paul Office 2,256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Marsden Bldg Maintenance 1,800 FTE
NAT-TCR 27-Ext. Sabalos Garden 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Aperion Care Jacksonville 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Springhill Suites Paso Robles 11.5 TCR
NAT-TCR WinChill LLC 11.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE WHI Cleveland East Management LLC 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Hall West 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE August Mack Environmental Indianapolis 108 FTE
NAT-SIZE BK Tech 108 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.