Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade · Indiana

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis

Indianapolis, IN · ~39 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade C.

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis safety composite

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis held a steady TCR band

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Indianapolis, IN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/15
  • PHOTO Parker Trutec
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Parker Trutec (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis falls in its industry

248 Heat treating metals and metal establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 15 Heat treating metals and metal employers in Indiana.

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis
Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis (39 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Bodycote Thermal Processing, Inc. - Indianapolis has more employees than the Heat treating metals and metal products median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · IN · Indianapolis

248 Heat treating metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Parker Trutec 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Superheat FGH Services 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paulo - Headquarters 0.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Analytic Stress Relieving, LLC 0.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indiana Limestone Company Headquarters 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lafayette Operations Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spy Run Bldg 3 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll White REMC - Monticello 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR Raleigh Managed Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Uct Ca 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parsec Charleston NS 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marshall Corporate Office 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG509 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.