Conduit, welded and lock joint, made from purchased iron or steel · Florida

Bostic Steel Inc

Miami, FL · ~67 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bostic Steel Inc runs at 307% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conduit, welded and lock joint, made from purchased iron or steel workplace, earning a grade F.

Bostic Steel Inc: 10.1 TCR = 307% of Conduit, welded and lock joint, made from purchased iron or steel BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bostic Steel Inc safety composite

Bostic Steel Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bostic Steel Inc: 10.2 → 12.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 15.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2023

Bostic Steel Inc's TCR rose 2.7 from 10.2 in 2017 to 12.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 15.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331210 · Miami, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 307% of ind

  • DART 3.7 DART
  • RANK #3/4
  • PHOTO Main
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Main (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Bostic Steel Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bostic Steel Inc averages 10.1 TCR (307% of the Conduit, welded and lock joint, made from purchased iron or steel BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bostic Steel Inc TCR series: 2017=10.2 · 2018=7.8 · 2019=5 · 2020=13.8 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=15.3 · 2023=12.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Bostic Steel Inc falls in its industry

329 Conduit, welded and lock joint establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 4 Conduit, welded and lock joint employers in Florida.

Bostic Steel Inc (67 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bostic Steel Inc
Bostic Steel Inc (67 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Bostic Steel Inc has fewer employees than the Conduit, welded and lock joint, made fro median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.9 3.7 7 0 0
2022 15.3 3.8 8 0 0
2021 5.9 2.0 3 0 0
2020 13.8 1.7 8 0 0
2019 5.0 2.5 4 0 0
2018 7.8 1.6 5 0 0
2017 10.2 3.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331210 · FL · Miami

329 Conduit, welded and lock joint, made from purchased iron or steel employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,467 employers in Miami, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Main 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Accu-Tube - Denver 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arntzen Corporation Woodstock 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hofmann Eau Claire Plant 9.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pompano Beach Service Center 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tri-County Electric Cooperative 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Habitat for Humanity of Pinellas 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE First Florida Constructors, LLC-Miami 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-MIA-MIAMI-MIA-TRML 9,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Hospital of Miami Inc. 6,876 FTE
CITY-NEAR MIACX0UPS MIA UPS 3,101 FTE
CITY-NEAR Office of Field Operations - Miami 2,879 FTE
NAT-TCR St. Louis Trudeau 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Health and Rehabilitation Center 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Unarco Material Handling, Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Kenneth C. Wilson 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parkerblock 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE TN105 Lebanon (American Corrugated) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hinz Trucking, Inc. 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.