Skilled Nursing Facility · California

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr

Pasadena, CA · ~148 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr runs at 156% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Skilled Nursing Facility workplace, earning a grade D.

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr: 10.1 TCR = 156% of Skilled Nursing Facility BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr safety composite

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr held a steady TCR band

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr's TCR held near 0.0 from 11.7 in 2018 to 11.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 16.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.7 · 2019=5.4 · 2021=16.8 · 2022=5.0 · 2023=11.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pasadena, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.1 · 156% of ind

  • DART 9.8 DART
  • RANK #496/739
  • PHOTO LP Rockwood, LLC
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 38 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LP Rockwood, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr averages 10.1 TCR (156% of the Skilled Nursing Facility BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr TCR series: 2018=11.7 · 2019=5.4 · 2021=16.8 · 2022=5 · 2023=11.7 · BLS 6.5

Where Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility establishments

Safer than 27% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #496 safest of 739 Skilled Nursing Facility employers in California.

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr (148 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr
Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr (148 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Pasadena Park Healthcare & Wellness Ctr has more employees than the Skilled Nursing Facility median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 11.7 9.8 5 1 0
2022 5.0 4.0 5 0 0
2021 16.8 10.5 14 2 0
2019 5.4 2.7 4 2 0
2018 11.7 8.7 10 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Pasadena

15,252 Skilled Nursing Facility employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 195 employers in Pasadena, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LP Rockwood, LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edwardsville Care Center 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mill Pond 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Seneca Health and Rehabilitation Center 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE OSF San Francisco Office 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE VAN NUYS DISTR HDQ 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE LADWP 18718 RAYEN 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE C A Rasmussen, Inc. 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR ACCO Engineered Systems 4,604 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2313-00000001 4,175 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Pasadena 2,397 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntington Hospital 2,228 FTE
NAT-TCR Viking Plastics Kentucky 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bostic Steel Inc 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Louis Trudeau 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Health and Rehabilitation Center 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Clifton Park #250 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE My Brothers' Keeper - Main Office 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Saint Paul Medical Center 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Products and Chemicals Inc.- Customer Engineering, Maintenance/Const/EST 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.