Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) manufacturing · Georgia

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands

Dalton, GA · ~52 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands runs at 38% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands: 1.3 TCR = 38% of Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands safety composite

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

60/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands: 0.0 → 1.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.8 TCR · DART/TCR 1.22× in 2021

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands's TCR rose 1.6 from 0.0 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325520 · Dalton, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.3 · 38% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #2/20
  • PHOTO MAPEI - Garland
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MAPEI - Garland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands averages 1.3 TCR (38% of the Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=1.8 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands falls in its industry

287 Caulking compounds (except gyp establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 20 Caulking compounds (except gyp employers in Georgia.

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands (52 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands
Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands (52 employees, TCR 1.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Bostik Dalton - formerly XL Brands has fewer employees than the Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 0 1 0
2019 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325520 · GA · Dalton

287 Caulking compounds (except gypsum base) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 292 employers in Dalton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MAPEI - Garland 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Covington 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR CCW - Wylie 1.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR LORD Corporation - Saegertown 1.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cleveland Hatchery (CV) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Transmission Support PC Field Services Maintenance Reliability 160 Lake Mirror Road Forest Park 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Statesboro Operating - 111 Stockyard Rd. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton Realty of Georgia - Atlanta East - Atlanta Realty 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hamilton Medical Center 1,606 FTE
CITY-NEAR Plant 97 1,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR SD 1,224 FTE
CITY-NEAR USA Dalton GA Antioch 1,077 FTE
NAT-TCR International Paper Recycling - Beaverton 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridge at Madrona Hills 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Baker Triangle Austin 1.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 44321d - Fort Myers 1.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Belmont Manor 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lile Relocation Services - Eugene Branch 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connecticut 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Williamsburg Houses 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.