Electromedical equipment manufacturing · Minnesota

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial

Arden Hills, MN · ~1,933 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial runs at 11% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electromedical equipment manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial: 0.4 TCR = 11% of Electromedical equipment manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial safety composite

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2017→2020

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial injury rate improved

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.7 in 2017 to 0.3 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 0.7 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · Arden Hills, MN AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 11% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #9/44
  • PHOTO GEHC : Aurora OH, HCS
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~1,933 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: GEHC : Aurora OH, HCS (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial averages 0.4 TCR (11% of the Electromedical equipment manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial TCR series: 2017=0.7 · 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.2 · 2020=0.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial falls in its industry

242 Electromedical equipment manuf establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 44 Electromedical equipment manuf employers in Minnesota.

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial (1,933 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial
Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial (1,933 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

Boston Scientific CRM National Commercial has more employees than the Electromedical equipment manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.3 0.1 9 0 0
2019 0.2 0.1 2 0 0
2018 0.4 0.1 5 0 0
2017 0.7 0.0 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · MN · Arden Hills

242 Electromedical equipment manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 51 employers in Arden Hills, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR GEHC : Aurora OH, HCS 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Medtronic MECC North 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR US Diabetes Care Wayne 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coherent, Inc - Traverse City 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE St. Joseph's Hospital 1,938 FTE
STATE-SIZE Midcontinent Media 1,926 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2573-MN101 1,940 FTE
STATE-SIZE St. Olaf College 1,917 FTE
CITY-NEAR Boston Scientific CRM 2,778 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes - Arden Hills Corporate Offices 2,164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes, Inc. 1,379 FTE
CITY-NEAR Land O'Lakes, Inc. - Sales Force 993 FTE
NAT-TCR Perimeter Office #1001 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Teledyne LeCroy PSG 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR AP Fabrications, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Office - Durand 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2904-SAS-CA 1,933 FTE
NAT-SIZE Licking Memorial Hospital 1,933 FTE
NAT-SIZE Black & Veatch P-Building 1,934 FTE
NAT-SIZE Janssen Horsham 1,935 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.