Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables · California

Brandt Packing, Co.

Reedley, CA · ~126 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brandt Packing, Co. runs at 139% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables workplace, earning a grade D.

Brandt Packing, Co.: 6.3 TCR = 139% of Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brandt Packing, Co. safety composite

Brandt Packing, Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

Brandt Packing, Co. injury rate improved

Brandt Packing, Co.'s TCR fell 0.6 from 9.6 in 2017 to 9.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=9.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=9.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Reedley, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 139% of ind

  • DART 7.2 DART
  • RANK #139/236
  • PHOTO Wildwood Packing and…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wildwood Packing and Cooling (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brandt Packing, Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brandt Packing, Co. averages 6.3 TCR (139% of the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brandt Packing, Co. TCR series: 2017=9.6 · 2018=1.9 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=9.8 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=9 · BLS 4.5

Where Brandt Packing, Co. falls in its industry

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #139 safest of 236 Sorting, grading, cleaning, an employers in California.

Brandt Packing, Co. (126 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brandt Packing, Co.
Brandt Packing, Co. (126 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Brandt Packing, Co. has more employees than the Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 9.0 7.2 10 0 0
2023 3.1 1.0 3 0 0
2022 9.8 6.6 9 0 0
2021 3.2 2.1 3 0 0
2020 5.9 3.9 6 0 0
2019 7.5 3.8 7 1 0
2018 1.9 1.9 2 0 0
2017 9.6 8.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Reedley

666 Sorting, grading, cleaning, and packing of fruits and vegetables employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 60 employers in Reedley, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wildwood Packing and Cooling 6.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascade Fruit Growers 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR DECCO US Post-Harvest Inc. - Wenatchee 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR California 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Blosser Ranch 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE T&A Onions - Salinas - Harvest 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anthony F Cubre Jr 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Shore Greenhouses, Inc. 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Adventist Medical Center-Reedley 961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sun Valley Packing 554 FTE
CITY-NEAR Moonlight Packing Company LLC Field 537 FTE
CITY-NEAR GAR BENNETT LLC 277 FTE
NAT-TCR Ginsberg's Foods Hudson NY 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR McCreary County Hardwoods, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Veit Disposal 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prinsco, Inc. - Prinsburg 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Getz Fire Equipment Company 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Annandale Elementary School 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE UMCasitaDelValle930 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE A to Z Drying, Inc. 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.