Fruit sorting, grading, and packing · California

Wildwood Packing and Cooling

Kingsburg, CA · ~83 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Wildwood Packing and Cooling runs at 138% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Fruit sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade D.

Wildwood Packing and Cooling: 6.2 TCR = 138% of Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Wildwood Packing and Cooling safety composite

Wildwood Packing and Cooling scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2017→2023

Wildwood Packing and Cooling injury rate improved

Wildwood Packing and Cooling's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.2 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.4 · 2018=7.0 · 2019=7.0 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=7.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 115114 · Kingsburg, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.2 · 138% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #138/236
  • PHOTO Brandt Packing, Co.
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~83 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brandt Packing, Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Wildwood Packing and Cooling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Wildwood Packing and Cooling averages 6.2 TCR (138% of the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Wildwood Packing and Cooling TCR series: 2017=2.4 · 2018=7 · 2019=7 · 2020=15.2 · 2021=4.7 · 2022=7 · 2023=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Wildwood Packing and Cooling falls in its industry

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #138 safest of 236 Fruit sorting, grading, and pa employers in California.

Wildwood Packing and Cooling (83 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Wildwood Packing and Cooling
Wildwood Packing and Cooling (83 employees, TCR 6.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Wildwood Packing and Cooling has more employees than the Fruit sorting, grading, and packing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.0 7.0 3 3 0
2021 4.7 4.7 2 2 0
2020 15.2 15.2 4 9 0
2019 7.0 7.0 3 3 0
2018 7.0 7.0 3 3 0
2017 2.4 1.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

115114 · CA · Kingsburg

666 Fruit sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 62 employers in Kingsburg, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brandt Packing, Co. 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main operations location 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cascade Fruit Growers 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hamilton Ranches Inc 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sunny Slope Trees 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Grangeville) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Stratford Shop) 83 FTE
STATE-SIZE Stone Land Co. (Lemoore Shop) 83 FTE
CITY-NEAR LEOPOLDO'S FARM SERVICE, INC. 2,541 FTE
CITY-NEAR OFR INC 1,020 FTE
CITY-NEAR EDITH VILLALBASO 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kingsburg Fruit Packing Inc. 524 FTE
NAT-TCR Hotel Monaco Seattle 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Filberts Farmhouse Kitchen 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Unit #1977 6.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rochester Manufacturing 6.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eagle Rock Distributing Co. - Calhoun 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Southwest Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation Headquarters and Districts 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE GrandeVille Senior Living Community 83 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremron - Lalp 83 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.