Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Brookdale Corona

Corona, CA · ~38 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Corona runs at 296% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Corona: 11.3 TCR = 296% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Corona safety composite

Brookdale Corona scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

27/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.1

2018→2024

Brookdale Corona injury rate improved

Brookdale Corona's TCR fell 2.1 from 13.0 in 2018 to 10.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 17.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=13.0 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7.9 · 2023=17.4 · 2024=10.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Corona, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 296% of ind

  • DART 10.9 DART
  • RANK #409/635
  • PHOTO 10272
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~38 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10272 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Corona in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Corona averages 11.3 TCR (296% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Corona TCR series: 2018=13 · 2019=15.2 · 2020=3.1 · 2021=7.9 · 2023=17.4 · 2024=10.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Corona falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #409 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Brookdale Corona (38 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Corona
Brookdale Corona (38 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Corona has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.9 10.9 3 0 0
2023 17.4 10.4 4 1 0
2021 7.9 3.9 1 1 0
2020 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2019 15.2 15.2 5 0 0
2018 13.0 3.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Corona

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 409 employers in Corona, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10272 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63006 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amber Court of Elizabeth 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Atria North Point 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O SHIPPING 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE GAR & S Farm Labor Services, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Almonds of California, Inc. 38 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bays Ranch Inc 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2535 Anselmo Dr 2,572 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company 2,388 FTE
CITY-NEAR Monster Energy Company - Anselmo Dr, Corona 2,335 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 289 1,587 FTE
NAT-TCR Arvada Care and Rehabilitation 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Minot Health and Rehab 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Iareo - Red Oak Package Center 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Wvpar - Parkersburg 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE El Rey Court 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valdosta Office 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Del R Gilbert & Son Block Co., Inc 38 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gypsum Supply Byron Center 38 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.