Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Amber Court of Elizabeth

Elizabeth, NJ · ~50 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Amber Court of Elizabeth runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Amber Court of Elizabeth: 11.3 TCR = 297% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Amber Court of Elizabeth safety composite

Amber Court of Elizabeth scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.0

2021→2024

Amber Court of Elizabeth injury rate improved

Amber Court of Elizabeth's TCR fell 8.0 from 12.2 in 2021 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 18.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=12.2 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Elizabeth, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 297% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #105/125
  • PHOTO Atria North Point
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~50 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Atria North Point (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Amber Court of Elizabeth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Amber Court of Elizabeth averages 11.3 TCR (297% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Amber Court of Elizabeth TCR series: 2021=12.2 · 2022=10.3 · 2023=18.4 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Amber Court of Elizabeth falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #105 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Amber Court of Elizabeth (50 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Amber Court of Elizabeth
Amber Court of Elizabeth (50 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Amber Court of Elizabeth has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 2 0 0
2023 18.4 16.4 2 7 0
2022 10.3 10.3 0 5 0
2021 12.2 10.2 1 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Elizabeth

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 145 employers in Elizabeth, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Atria North Point 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63137 SUNRISE OF MISSION VIEJO 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR COURTYARD AT JAMESTOWN 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Vista Senior Living 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kindle Energy LLC 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE MCKEE 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE KLINE BROTHERS LANDSCAPING EAST 50 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kiely Civil Glassboro 50 FTE
CITY-NEAR AMZL : DEW2 2,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR Trinitas Regional Medical Center 2,376 FTE
CITY-NEAR APM Terminals 1,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maher Berth 64 1,041 FTE
NAT-TCR Owens-Illinois, Inc. Plant 76 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Vic Firth / Avedis Zildjian Company 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Phoenix E70 Parks&Rec 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hall Ambulance Service, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE C3 Industries, Inc - Franklin 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid-West Mfg. LLC - Chicago Heights Plant 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE LeafGuard of Northern Georgia 50 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hollingsworth USPS Auburn 50 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.