Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

Atria North Point

Alpharetta, GA · ~122 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Atria North Point runs at 297% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Atria North Point: 11.3 TCR = 297% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Atria North Point safety composite

Atria North Point scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.9

2016→2023

Atria North Point injury rate improved

Atria North Point's TCR fell 2.9 from 10.5 in 2016 to 7.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 17.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.5 · 2017=12.6 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=7.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Alpharetta, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.3 · 297% of ind

  • DART 4.3 DART
  • RANK #146/205
  • PHOTO Amber Court of Eliza…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~122 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Amber Court of Elizabeth (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Atria North Point in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Atria North Point averages 11.3 TCR (297% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Atria North Point TCR series: 2016=10.5 · 2017=12.6 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=14.7 · 2021=17.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=7.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Atria North Point falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #146 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

Atria North Point (122 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Atria North Point
Atria North Point (122 employees, TCR 11.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Atria North Point has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 7.5 4.3 7 0 0
2022 7.5 5.0 6 0 0
2021 17.3 13.3 6 7 0
2020 14.7 9.4 8 6 0
2019 8.9 4.9 9 0 0
2017 12.6 3.9 13 0 0
2016 10.5 5.6 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Alpharetta

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 329 employers in Alpharetta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Amber Court of Elizabeth 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63137 SUNRISE OF MISSION VIEJO 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR COURTYARD AT JAMESTOWN 11.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Valley Vista Senior Living 11.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Atlanta Habitat for Humanity 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE UTILITY LINES CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, LLC 110 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE Valley Mechanical 122 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCI Atlanta ISS 122 FTE
CITY-NEAR MarketSource, Inc. 5,905 FTE
CITY-NEAR ALPHARETTA, GA 3,718 FTE
CITY-NEAR LOCATION 20001 2,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Douglas Corporation 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Tear A Part, LLC (Salt Lake City) 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Newaygo Medical Care Facility 11.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Synergy Project Contractors, Inc. 11.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crestwood Center Sacramento 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO008 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Quikrete - Dal 122 FTE
NAT-SIZE Chase Ranch 122 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.