Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New Jersey

Brookdale Hamilton

Hamilton, NJ · ~49 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Hamilton runs at 339% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Hamilton: 12.9 TCR = 339% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Hamilton safety composite

Brookdale Hamilton scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.87 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−399.2

2016→2024

Brookdale Hamilton injury rate improved

Brookdale Hamilton's TCR fell 399.2 from 401.9 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 401.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=401.9 · 2017=20.0 · 2019=186.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=13.8 · 2023=25.0 · 2024=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Hamilton, NJ ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.9 · 339% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #110/125
  • PHOTO Kinship Pointe at Mc…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kinship Pointe at McCook (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Hamilton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Hamilton averages 12.9 TCR (339% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Hamilton TCR series: 2016=401.9 · 2017=20 · 2019=186.9 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=13.8 · 2023=25 · 2024=2.7 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Hamilton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #110 safest of 125 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New Jersey.

Brookdale Hamilton (49 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Hamilton
Brookdale Hamilton (49 employees, TCR 12.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Hamilton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.7 0.0 1 0 0
2023 25.0 25.0 9 0 0
2021 13.8 11.1 4 1 0
2020 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2019 186.9 93.5 1 1 0
2017 20.0 0.0 8 0 0
2016 401.9 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NJ · Hamilton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 85 employers in Hamilton, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kinship Pointe at McCook 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOLARIS SENIOR LIVING STUART 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Falls River Court 12.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KRE-BSL HUSKY PLYMOUTH OPERATION LLC 12.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE NJR Clean Energy Ventures Corp 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE American Water Operations and Maintenance, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Jacobs - NORTH HUDSON SEWERAGE AUTHORITY - OMI 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE IPS - Integrated Project Services, LLC - Cherry Hill 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR RWJ University Hospital at Hamilton 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR Allies, Inc. 883 FTE
CITY-NEAR NJTRN - TRENTON 489 FTE
CITY-NEAR TRENTON (NJTRN) 485 FTE
NAT-TCR Medic Ems 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trinity Grove 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Delta Sky Club Jax 12.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Kinship Pointe at McCook 12.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE American Maplan Corporation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Traughber Mechanical Services 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ohio Galvanizing 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insight Logistics Management LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.