Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · New York

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care

Ithaca, NY · ~29 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care runs at 296% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care: 11.2 TCR = 296% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care safety composite

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

DART rate
F 26.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care: 0.0 → 37.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 46.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.36× in 2024

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care's TCR rose 37.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 37.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 46.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Ithaca, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.2 · 296% of ind

  • DART 26.5 DART
  • RANK #231/283
  • PHOTO CSL Red Oak 2018, LLC
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~29 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CSL Red Oak 2018, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care averages 11.2 TCR (296% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=3.6 · 2019=10.4 · 2020=4 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=46.1 · 2024=37 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 25% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #231 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in New York.

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care (29 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care
Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care (29 employees, TCR 11.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Ithaca Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 37.0 26.5 5 2 0
2023 46.1 4.2 11 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 4.0 4.0 1 0 0
2019 10.4 6.9 3 0 0
2018 3.6 0.0 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NY · Ithaca

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 119 employers in Ithaca, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CSL Red Oak 2018, LLC 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Country Meadows of South Hills 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Firs 11.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Cottages of Carmel 11.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walnut Ridge Dairy LLC 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE RG&E Canandaigua 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE NYSEG Norwich 29 FTE
STATE-SIZE Noble Wind Operations Churubusco NY 29 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cayuga Medical Center 1,595 FTE
CITY-NEAR BorgWarner Ithaca LLC 1,206 FTE
CITY-NEAR Signworks 1,007 FTE
CITY-NEAR Audiology 990 FTE
NAT-TCR Dubois 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Minick -Council 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Comfort Matters LLC 11.2 TCR
NAT-TCR S03934 - WI Germantown 11.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE EcoLogic Energy Solutions 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Starpower Communications dba RCN-Ann Arrundel 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Talladega Feedmill 29 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ring Container Decatur IL 29 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.