Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Louisiana

Brookdale Lafayette

Lafayette, LA · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Lafayette runs at 239% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Lafayette: 9.1 TCR = 239% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Lafayette safety composite

Brookdale Lafayette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 5%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 9.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

DART rate
F 18.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 5% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookdale Lafayette: 0.1 → 18.3 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.3 TCR · DART/TCR 2.02× in 2024

Brookdale Lafayette's TCR rose 18.2 from 0.1 in 2016 to 18.3 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lafayette, LA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.1 · 239% of ind

  • DART 18.3 DART
  • RANK #23/30
  • PHOTO Azura Memory Care of…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azura Memory Care of Eau Claire2 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Louisiana employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Lafayette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Lafayette averages 9.1 TCR (239% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Lafayette TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0 · 2018=13.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2020=9 · 2021=5.7 · 2022=16.6 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=18.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Lafayette falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 37% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Louisiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 30 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Louisiana.

Brookdale Lafayette (44 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Lafayette
Brookdale Lafayette (44 employees, TCR 9.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Lafayette has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.3 18.3 8 0 0
2023 9.7 9.7 4 0 0
2022 16.6 11.1 6 0 0
2021 5.7 5.7 1 1 0
2020 9.0 9.0 3 0 0
2019 8.4 5.6 3 0 0
2018 13.8 11.1 5 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.1 0.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · LA · Lafayette

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 6,723 rated employers in Louisiana with headcount on file · 312 employers in Lafayette, LA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azura Memory Care of Eau Claire2 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Buncombe Operations, LLC 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Bloomingdale 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Senior Living of Las Vegas 9.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Martco Forestry LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shreve Land Constructors, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Davie Shoring Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bernuchaux Contractor, Inc. 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Acadian Ambulance 3,166 FTE
CITY-NEAR OLG Lafayette General Medical Center 2,489 FTE
CITY-NEAR Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. 1,348 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stuller, Inc. Global Headquarters 1,330 FTE
NAT-TCR Location 3 - 100 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yale-New Haven Hospital 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bay Cast Machine shop 9.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 9.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE RushShelby Energy 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE RC Bus Aids and Transportation 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Heights NS 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE CHEP East Syracuse Service Center (UT73) 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.