Bus operation, school and employee · Tennessee

RC Bus Aids and Transportation

Murfreesboro, TN · ~44 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

RC Bus Aids and Transportation runs at 72% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Bus operation, school and employee workplace, earning a grade B.

RC Bus Aids and Transportation: 3.3 TCR = 72% of Bus operation, school and employee BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

RC Bus Aids and Transportation safety composite

RC Bus Aids and Transportation scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

RC Bus Aids and Transportation held a steady TCR band

RC Bus Aids and Transportation's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485410 · Murfreesboro, TN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.3 · 72% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/21
  • PHOTO Seneca - Zelienople
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seneca - Zelienople (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

RC Bus Aids and Transportation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows RC Bus Aids and Transportation averages 3.3 TCR (72% of the Bus operation, school and employee BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

RC Bus Aids and Transportation TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.1 · 2018=7.3 · 2019=8.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.8 · 2022=0 · 2023=5 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where RC Bus Aids and Transportation falls in its industry

1,574 Bus operation, school and empl establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 21 Bus operation, school and empl employers in Tennessee.

RC Bus Aids and Transportation (44 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate RC Bus Aids and Transportation
RC Bus Aids and Transportation (44 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 4.3

RC Bus Aids and Transportation has fewer employees than the Bus operation, school and employee median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.0 5.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 8.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2017 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485410 · TN · Murfreesboro

1,574 Bus operation, school and employee employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 256 employers in Murfreesboro, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seneca - Zelienople 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 11797 - Watertown 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mlaker LLC 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 572-Batavia 3.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE South Pittsburg Office 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Building Group, Inc. 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Walker Building Group, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE JACKSON SHOP & WEST TENN STRUCTURES 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Murfreesboro 2,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR TNNAS16 ASCENSION SAINT THOMAS RUTHERFORD 1,984 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BNA3 1,811 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BNA3 1,708 FTE
NAT-TCR Harris Acoustics, Ltd. 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hopkinsville 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Crown Lift Trucks Hebron 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Universal Stainless - North Jackson 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHEP East Syracuse Service Center (UT73) 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Lafayette 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE RushShelby Energy 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maple Heights NS 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.