Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Brookdale Monroe

Monroe, WA · ~62 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Monroe runs at 557% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Monroe: 21.2 TCR = 557% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Monroe safety composite

Brookdale Monroe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.7

2017→2023

Brookdale Monroe injury rate improved

Brookdale Monroe's TCR fell 2.7 from 18.2 in 2017 to 15.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 38.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=18.2 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=38.3 · 2021=22.9 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=15.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Monroe, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.2 · 557% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #206/216
  • PHOTO Sugar Hill Assisted …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sugar Hill Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Monroe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Monroe averages 21.2 TCR (557% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Monroe TCR series: 2017=18.2 · 2018=17.8 · 2019=17.7 · 2020=38.3 · 2021=22.9 · 2022=17.9 · 2023=15.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Monroe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #206 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Brookdale Monroe (62 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Monroe
Brookdale Monroe (62 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Monroe has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 15.4 8.8 7 0 0
2022 17.9 15.7 7 1 0
2021 22.9 14.6 10 1 0
2020 38.3 32.3 10 9 0
2019 17.7 15.7 9 0 0
2018 17.8 11.9 9 0 0
2017 18.2 12.1 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Monroe

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 48 employers in Monroe, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sugar Hill Assisted Living 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emerson House At River Pointe 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sea Cliff Assisted Living 21.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP Salisbury, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Salisbury 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Warren Morgan Orchards 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis County PUD - Main Office 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Unimark Construction Group, LLC 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin PUD - Office 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR Canyon Creek Cabinet Company 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headquarters 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5628 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00210 295 FTE
NAT-TCR Country View Manor 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR CHEP Cedar Rapids Service Center (USIV) 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AZN004 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakewood Products, Inc. 21.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Union Supply Group, Inc. - NV DC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sprague Elementary School 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nitrogen Gas Products Brecksville Division 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashua, NH 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.