Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Idaho

Emerson House At River Pointe

Garden City, ID · ~39 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
21.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Emerson House At River Pointe runs at 558% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Emerson House At River Pointe: 21.2 TCR = 558% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Emerson House At River Pointe safety composite

Emerson House At River Pointe scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 21.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−32.4

2016→2022

Emerson House At River Pointe injury rate improved

Emerson House At River Pointe's TCR fell 32.4 from 50.1 in 2016 to 17.6 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 50.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=50.1 · 2017=24.1 · 2019=34.4 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=17.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Garden City, ID ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 21.2 · 558% of ind

  • DART 8.8 DART
  • RANK #33/36
  • PHOTO Sugar Hill Assisted …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 49 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sugar Hill Assisted Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Idaho employers → · Look up another →

Emerson House At River Pointe in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Emerson House At River Pointe averages 21.2 TCR (558% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Emerson House At River Pointe TCR series: 2016=50.1 · 2017=24.1 · 2019=34.4 · 2020=16.8 · 2021=13.2 · 2022=17.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Emerson House At River Pointe falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Idaho alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 36 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Idaho.

Emerson House At River Pointe (39 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Emerson House At River Pointe
Emerson House At River Pointe (39 employees, TCR 21.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Emerson House At River Pointe has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 17.6 8.8 5 1 0
2021 13.2 13.2 4 0 0
2020 16.8 16.8 5 0 0
2019 34.4 34.4 11 0 0
2017 24.1 24.1 8 0 0
2016 50.1 50.1 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · ID · Garden City

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,774 rated employers in Idaho with headcount on file · 21 employers in Garden City, ID · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sugar Hill Assisted Living 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Monroe 21.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MCAP Salisbury, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at Salisbury 21.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aegis of Lynnwood 21.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Magic Valley Produce, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE Circle H Construction, Inc. 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5110 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE MDM Construction Inc. 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clearview Cleaning Services Inc 420 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2861 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2861 281 FTE
CITY-NEAR WestVet Boise 265 FTE
NAT-TCR 115865-Mia-Buena Vista Carrier Anx 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZSCH 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dollar General (WC USX DBE) 21.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Marion County Highway Department 21.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG767 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG596 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG760 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metal Sales MC - Jefferson 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.