Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Brookdale Newberg

Newberg, OR · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Newberg runs at 167% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Brookdale Newberg: 6.3 TCR = 167% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Newberg safety composite

Brookdale Newberg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 57% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.33 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2017→2024

Brookdale Newberg injury rate improved

Brookdale Newberg's TCR fell 0.6 from 5.2 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 20.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.73× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.2 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=20.0 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Newberg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 167% of ind

  • DART 4.6 DART
  • RANK #63/218
  • PHOTO Brookdale Roseville
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Roseville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Newberg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Newberg averages 6.3 TCR (167% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Newberg TCR series: 2017=5.2 · 2018=9.2 · 2019=20 · 2020=0.1 · 2021=5.2 · 2022=5.2 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=4.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Newberg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 57% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Brookdale Newberg (47 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Newberg
Brookdale Newberg (47 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Newberg has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.6 4.6 1 1 0
2023 1.1 1.1 5 0 0
2022 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2021 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2020 0.1 0.1 5 1 0
2019 20.0 8.9 9 0 0
2018 9.2 9.2 4 0 0
2017 5.2 2.6 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Newberg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 49 employers in Newberg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Roseville 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wickshire Deer Park 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Brighton 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Atriums 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 00463 ROSEBURG CUST SVC CNTR 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northern Operations Center 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pahlisch Commercial Inc 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR A-dec, Inc. 1,071 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR363 PROVIDENCE NEWBERG MEDICAL CTR-NEWBERG H 553 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000570 498 FTE
CITY-NEAR 701-00220 334 FTE
NAT-TCR Cumberland Heights Foundation, Inc. 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prescription Landscape - Shakopee Office 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Vets 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Regent St 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoover Treated Wood Products - Milford 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harbor Fish Market 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitch's Green Thumb Landscaping Corp. 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Northeast Treatment Plant 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.