General warehousing and storage · California

Rite Aid Distribution Center

Lancaster, CA · ~488 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
10.0
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rite Aid Distribution Center runs at 172% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade D.

Rite Aid Distribution Center: 10.0 TCR = 172% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rite Aid Distribution Center safety composite

Rite Aid Distribution Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rite Aid Distribution Center held a steady TCR band

Rite Aid Distribution Center's TCR held near 0.2 from 8.2 in 2016 to 8.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.69× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=19.7 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=8.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Lancaster, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 10.0 · 172% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #977/1131
  • PHOTO BENICIA LOCATION
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 330 inj
  • SIZE ~488 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BENICIA LOCATION (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Rite Aid Distribution Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rite Aid Distribution Center averages 10.0 TCR (172% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rite Aid Distribution Center TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=7.4 · 2021=12.8 · 2022=19.7 · 2023=12.3 · 2024=8.4 · BLS 5.8

Where Rite Aid Distribution Center falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #977 safest of 1131 General warehousing and storag employers in California.

Rite Aid Distribution Center (488 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rite Aid Distribution Center
Rite Aid Distribution Center (488 employees, TCR 10.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Rite Aid Distribution Center has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.4 6.9 23 0 0
2023 12.3 8.6 46 3 0
2022 19.7 12.2 76 0 0
2021 12.8 8.8 52 0 0
2020 7.4 6.1 37 2 0
2019 5.1 4.9 24 0 0
2018 5.8 4.0 29 0 0
2016 8.2 5.9 43 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · CA · Lancaster

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 131 employers in Lancaster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BENICIA LOCATION 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DEN8 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 4648-46480005-00258 10.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amazon Transportation Services : BUF5 10.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Santa Maria Office 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camblin Steel Service, Inc. 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPS Technologies dba Cherry Aerospace 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Antelope Valley Union High School District 3,219 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 549 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California State Prison-Los Angeles County 1,505 FTE
CITY-NEAR BYD Coach & Bus LLC 679 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Plymouth 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Lakeland Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Midwest Masonry, Inc. 10.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Willows at Harrodsburg 10.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Electrical Corporation of America, Inc. 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atlanta,GA 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE Superior Essex Communications LLC 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE Grandview 488 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.