Continuing care retirement communities · Texas

Brookdale Senior Living

San Antonio, TX · ~95 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Senior Living runs at 252% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Senior Living: 9.6 TCR = 252% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Senior Living safety composite

Brookdale Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−58.4

2016→2018

Brookdale Senior Living injury rate improved

Brookdale Senior Living's TCR fell 58.4 from 67.2 in 2016 to 8.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2016 at 67.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=67.2 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=8.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · San Antonio, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 252% of ind

  • DART 6.9 DART
  • RANK #174/220
  • PHOTO The Springs Of Scott…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~95 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Springs Of Scottsdale (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Senior Living averages 9.6 TCR (252% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Senior Living TCR series: 2016=67.2 · 2017=10.4 · 2018=8.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Senior Living falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #174 safest of 220 Continuing care retirement com employers in Texas.

Brookdale Senior Living (95 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Senior Living
Brookdale Senior Living (95 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Brookdale Senior Living has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 8.8 6.9 14 0 0
2017 10.4 7.8 4 0 0
2016 67.2 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · San Antonio

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,207 employers in San Antonio, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Springs Of Scottsdale 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of Mt.Vernon 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Newcastle 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Ivy at Ellington 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CenterPoint Energy - North District Houston 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pacesetter Homes, LLC 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rockin R Construction 95 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hillsboro Concrete Buildings 95 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bexar County Hospital District 8,703 FTE
CITY-NEAR Legend Oaks Health & Rehabilitation West San Antonio 6,953 FTE
CITY-NEAR ISS Facility Services Inc. 6,177 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buena Vida of San Antonio 5,262 FTE
NAT-TCR Superior Mechanical Service 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Crestwood American River Residential Services/Psychiatric Health Facility 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Ambulance, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tallasee Health and Rehabilitation, LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Shopko Store #9 (Marshfield, WI) 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Waupun 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lehigh Schkl Hvn - Schuylkill Haven 95 FTE
NAT-SIZE 43 Printworks Drive 95 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.