Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Ohio

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton

Dayton, OH · ~67 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade F.

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton: 9.0 TCR = 238% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton safety composite

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.3

2016→2021

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton injury rate improved

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton's TCR fell 6.3 from 10.3 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.3 · 2017=20.2 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Dayton, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 238% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #122/155
  • PHOTO Woods Services
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Woods Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton averages 9.0 TCR (238% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton TCR series: 2016=10.3 · 2017=20.2 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=2.2 · 2020=11.7 · 2021=4 · BLS 3.8

Where ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #122 safest of 155 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Ohio.

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton (67 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton
ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton (67 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

ViaQuest Residential Services - Dayton has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.0 4.0 2 0 0
2020 11.7 5.0 7 0 0
2019 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2018 5.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 20.2 13.0 14 0 0
2016 10.3 8.0 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · OH · Dayton

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 599 employers in Dayton, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Woods Services 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ABLE, Inc 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beecher 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Easterseals Arkansas - OSB 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Losely 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Belmont Office and Svc Bldg 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens Office/Svc Ctr 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE RCS Construction 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Miami Valley Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Dayton 5,359 FTE
CITY-NEAR Dayton Children's Hospital 3,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR CareSource Management Services LLC 3,172 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Skeet Club 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 4598-Rtc Flagstaff 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Champion Topeka 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The Orchard 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Reilly Plating Co. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ram Tool Construction Supply Company - Atlanta 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Service Steel East Moline, Van Pelt Corp 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kinetic Systems Inc. Scarborough Office 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.