Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Washington

Brookdale Torbett

Richland, WA · ~41 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookdale Torbett runs at 344% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookdale Torbett: 13.1 TCR = 344% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookdale Torbett safety composite

Brookdale Torbett scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 16.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.0

2018→2024

Brookdale Torbett injury rate improved

Brookdale Torbett's TCR fell 1.0 from 21.4 in 2018 to 20.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 21.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.29× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=21.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=15.0 · 2024=20.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Richland, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 344% of ind

  • DART 16.9 DART
  • RANK #160/216
  • PHOTO SPRING ARBOR OF THOM…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SPRING ARBOR OF THOMASVILLE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Brookdale Torbett in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookdale Torbett averages 13.1 TCR (344% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookdale Torbett TCR series: 2018=21.4 · 2020=5.2 · 2021=13.4 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=15 · 2024=20.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Brookdale Torbett falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 216 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Brookdale Torbett (41 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookdale Torbett
Brookdale Torbett (41 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Brookdale Torbett has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.3 16.9 6 0 0
2023 15.0 11.2 4 0 0
2022 3.3 0.0 1 0 0
2021 13.4 10.7 5 0 0
2020 5.2 5.2 2 0 0
2018 21.4 15.3 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WA · Richland

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 83 employers in Richland, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SPRING ARBOR OF THOMASVILLE 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR New Falls Home LLC 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elim Shores Independent and Assisted Living 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maplewood at Brewster 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Waterworks, LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cascade Natural Gas Bellingham District Office-Operations-Field 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Soos Creek Water & Sewer District 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE NSK20 - North Sky - Tacoma 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000320 4,577 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA566 KADLEC REGIONAL MEDICAL CTR-RICHLAND HR 2,150 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waste Treatment Completion Company (WTCC) 1,978 FTE
CITY-NEAR Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) 673 FTE
NAT-TCR Kennie's Taneytown 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Earth Works Unlimited of FLorida 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Palmetto Landing 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hainesport Transportation Group 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salina Service Center 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE R&S Construction Services Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Restoration Relief 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.