Hotels (except casino hotels) · California

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge

Redding, CA · ~156 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge runs at 436% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade F.

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge: 13.1 TCR = 436% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge safety composite

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2019→2024

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge injury rate improved

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge's TCR fell 2.3 from 13.6 in 2019 to 11.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 19.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=13.6 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=19.5 · 2024=11.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Redding, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.1 · 436% of ind

  • DART 9.2 DART
  • RANK #1015/1298
  • PHOTO Colorado Springs Dua…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~156 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Colorado Springs Dual Hotel LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge averages 13.1 TCR (436% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge TCR series: 2019=13.6 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=19.5 · 2024=11.3 · BLS 3.0

Where Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1015 safest of 1298 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in California.

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge (156 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge
Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge (156 employees, TCR 13.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Sheraton Redding Hotel at the Sundial Bridge has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 11.3 9.2 11 0 0
2023 19.5 11.3 19 0 0
2022 7.9 4.9 8 0 0
2019 13.6 11.3 12 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · CA · Redding

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 207 employers in Redding, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Colorado Springs Dual Hotel LLC 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hotel Figueroa 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Motel 6 Indio 13.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Targhee Resort 13.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bud of California Celery 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Foods, Inc. 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Villa Park Strathmore 156 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing Plant 156 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6403-64030151 1,894 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Medical Center Redding 1,789 FTE
CITY-NEAR 64030151-151001 MERCY MEDICAL CENTER REDDING 1,704 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2643-64030151-151001 1,662 FTE
NAT-TCR Manko Window Systems, Inc. - Manhattan 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Earth Works Unlimited of FLorida 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Kennie's Taneytown 13.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Foodservice Boston - 0561 13.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE ISE Mount Pleasant 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE ChemDesign Products, Inc. 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE Palms Behavioral Health 156 FTE
NAT-SIZE XSell Resources 156 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.