Electric power generation, hydroelectric · New York

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson

Queensbury, NY · ~52 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson runs at 307% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson: 3.7 TCR = 307% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson safety composite

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson: 0.0 → 14.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 14.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.49× in 2024

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson's TCR rose 14.6 from 0.0 in 2016 to 14.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Queensbury, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.7 · 307% of ind

  • DART 5.5 DART
  • RANK #12/30
  • PHOTO Eugene Water & Elect…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Eugene Water & Electric Board (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Brookfield Renewable - Hudson averages 3.7 TCR (307% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=5.3 · 2019=1.7 · 2020=2 · 2021=0 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=1.8 · 2024=14.6 · BLS 1.2

Where Brookfield Renewable - Hudson falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 41% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 30 Electric power generation, hyd employers in New York.

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson (52 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Brookfield Renewable - Hudson
Brookfield Renewable - Hudson (52 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Brookfield Renewable - Hudson has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 14.6 5.5 4 4 0
2023 1.8 0.0 0 1 0
2022 3.9 1.9 0 2 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2019 1.7 0.0 0 1 0
2018 5.3 3.6 1 2 0
2017 3.8 0.0 0 2 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · NY · Queensbury

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 62 employers in Queensbury, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Eugene Water & Electric Board 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Site Bulk Material Handling 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grant County PUD#2 - Power Delivery 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pelton 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Columbia Care, NY, LLC.-Riverhead 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE KW NJ, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMC 3 City Center 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brookfield Renewable - Potsdam 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR CR Bard / BD 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR BD 644 FTE
CITY-NEAR Community Work and Independence 524 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2116 369 FTE
NAT-TCR Brookdale Sparks 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Teutopolis 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mokena 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Southcoast #069 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Industry- Paper - B355 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reddy Ag Service, Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advantage Tank Lines 20021 Detroit 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Woodstream Corporation Mechanicsburg 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.