Electric power generation, hydroelectric · Wisconsin

Site Bulk Material Handling

Oak Creek, WI · ~76 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Site Bulk Material Handling runs at 304% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, hydroelectric workplace, earning a grade F.

Site Bulk Material Handling: 3.6 TCR = 304% of Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS 1.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Site Bulk Material Handling safety composite

Site Bulk Material Handling scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.3

2016→2024

Site Bulk Material Handling injury rate improved

Site Bulk Material Handling's TCR fell 5.3 from 5.3 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 11.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.3 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221111 · Oak Creek, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 3.6 · 304% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/8
  • PHOTO Brookfield Renewable…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookfield Renewable - Hudson (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Site Bulk Material Handling in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Site Bulk Material Handling averages 3.6 TCR (304% of the Electric power generation, hydroelectric BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Site Bulk Material Handling TCR series: 2016=5.3 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=3.9 · 2020=2.6 · 2021=11.5 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=2.7 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Site Bulk Material Handling falls in its industry

129 Electric power generation, hyd establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 8 Electric power generation, hyd employers in Wisconsin.

Site Bulk Material Handling (76 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Site Bulk Material Handling
Site Bulk Material Handling (76 employees, TCR 3.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Site Bulk Material Handling has more employees than the Electric power generation, hydroelectric median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.7 1.3 2 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 2 0 0
2021 11.5 11.5 9 0 0
2020 2.6 1.3 2 0 0
2019 3.9 1.3 3 0 0
2018 1.4 1.4 1 0 0
2017 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2016 5.3 2.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221111 · WI · Oak Creek

129 Electric power generation, hydroelectric employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 134 employers in Oak Creek, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookfield Renewable - Hudson 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eugene Water & Electric Board 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pelton 3.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grant County PUD#2 - Power Delivery 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Creekwood Complex 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genoa #3 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE KEWAUNEE 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rock Solid Stabilization and Reclamation, Inc 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - MKE2 3,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR WIOAK - OAK CREEK 1,358 FTE
CITY-NEAR OAK CREEK (WIOAK) 1,240 FTE
CITY-NEAR Stella & Chewy's 740 FTE
NAT-TCR Verdegaal Brothers, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Inland Empire Deli Provisions - Front Street 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 800 General 3.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Arc/Warren County Chapter, Inc. 3.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meriden Mfg Inc 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jos. H. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fujishige Farms, Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE F&H Construction 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.