General services departments, government · North Carolina

Buildings and Grounds

Concord, NC · ~52 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Buildings and Grounds runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical General services departments, government workplace, earning a grade D.

Buildings and Grounds: 4.0 TCR = 125% of General services departments, government BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Buildings and Grounds safety composite

Buildings and Grounds scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2016→2021

Buildings and Grounds injury rate improved

Buildings and Grounds's TCR fell 8.2 from 8.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 8.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.2 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · Concord, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 125% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #51/105
  • PHOTO Morgan County Admini…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Morgan County Administration Building (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Buildings and Grounds in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Buildings and Grounds averages 4.0 TCR (125% of the General services departments, government BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Buildings and Grounds TCR series: 2016=8.2 · 2017=0 · 2018=7.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Buildings and Grounds falls in its industry

1,496 General services departments, establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #51 safest of 105 General services departments, employers in North Carolina.

Buildings and Grounds (52 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Buildings and Grounds
Buildings and Grounds (52 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Buildings and Grounds has fewer employees than the General services departments, government median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.1 8.1 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 7.7 5.1 3 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.2 5.4 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · NC · Concord

1,496 General services departments, government employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 338 employers in Concord, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Morgan County Administration Building 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Public Works 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orange County - Library Services - Main Branch 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jackson County 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sutton Energy Complex CC/CT 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Windsor Investments LLC d/b/a Windsor Homes 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wilson Covington Construction Company 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Office 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-CHS NorthEast 2,949 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0070-Atrium Health Cabarrus 2,870 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : CLT3 1,263 FTE
NAT-TCR National Door and Trim 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Countrybrook Living Center 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ADESA Pittsburgh 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Springfield Hospital 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE CHI Overhead Doors, Service Centers 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Evansville Care Center 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sacramento warehouse 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Metro Dentalcare-Richfield 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.