Utility Company · California

CA-General Office #3

Rosemead, CA · ~444 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA-General Office #3 runs at 110% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility Company workplace, earning a grade C.

CA-General Office #3: 0.8 TCR = 110% of Utility Company BLS 0.7 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA-General Office #3 safety composite

CA-General Office #3 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 69% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 45%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.77 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.5

2016→2024

CA-General Office #3 injury rate improved

CA-General Office #3's TCR fell 1.5 from 1.8 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Rosemead, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.8 · 110% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #74/183
  • PHOTO NEW Cooperative Inc.…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~444 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: NEW Cooperative Inc. - Fort Dodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA-General Office #3 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA-General Office #3 averages 0.8 TCR (110% of the Utility Company BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA-General Office #3 TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=1.1 · 2018=1.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=0.3 · BLS 0.7

Where CA-General Office #3 falls in its industry

1,475 Utility Company establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #74 safest of 183 Utility Company employers in California.

CA-General Office #3 (444 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CA-General Office #3
CA-General Office #3 (444 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

CA-General Office #3 has more employees than the Utility Company median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.2 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.9 0.0 2 2 0
2020 0.5 0.0 2 0 0
2019 0.5 0.0 0 2 0
2018 1.4 0.6 4 1 0
2017 1.1 0.0 3 1 0
2016 1.8 0.6 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · CA · Rosemead

1,475 Utility Company employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 51 employers in Rosemead, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR NEW Cooperative Inc. - Fort Dodge 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Americare Systems Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Stratacor 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Michels Corporation-WI-Brownsville 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE XL Construction 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE C. Overaa & Co. 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cacique Inc. 444 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6768-67680038-1190 444 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 597 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 603 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 260 2,546 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-General Office #1 - SCE 10 1,117 FTE
NAT-TCR MetroPower Inc BR8 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Nachi America Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Prtbj - Bayamon Center 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sun Construction & Design Services, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mtbil - Billings 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE United Infrastructure Group 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE nVent Thermal, LLC 444 FTE
NAT-SIZE DC37 444 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.