wired telecommunication carriers · California

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1

Ontario, CA · ~488 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 runs at 87% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical wired telecommunication carriers workplace, earning a grade C.

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1: 0.6 TCR = 87% of wired telecommunication carriers BLS 0.7 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 safety composite

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2022→2023

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 injury rate improved

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1's TCR fell 0.4 from 0.8 in 2022 to 0.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.8 · 2023=0.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 517111 · Ontario, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.6 · 87% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #5/42
  • PHOTO IL - Elmhurst, 688 I…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~488 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IL - Elmhurst, 688 Industrial Dr (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 averages 0.6 TCR (87% of the wired telecommunication carriers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 TCR series: 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.4 · BLS 0.7

Where CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 falls in its industry

455 wired telecommunication carrie establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 42 wired telecommunication carrie employers in California.

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 (488 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1
CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 (488 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 515 employees and a TCR of 4.0

CA_Ontario_1260 S Dupont Ave_ADLAREG1 has fewer employees than the wired telecommunication carriers median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.4 0.0 2 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

517111 · CA · Ontario

455 wired telecommunication carriers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 599 employers in Ontario, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IL - Elmhurst, 688 Industrial Dr 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MO_Kansas City_6550 Winchester Ave_0AKC9400 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR WA - Virtual - C+ 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR NC_Greensboro_721-A N Regional Rd Lot #2A_0AGR3150 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Santa Maria Office 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE Camblin Steel Service, Inc. 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE SPS Technologies dba Cherry Aerospace 488 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Aid Distribution Center 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime Healthcare Services Inc. Location: St. Mary's, Passaic LLC 46-3499370 (HP29) 10,997 FTE
CITY-NEAR CAONA - ONTARIO HUB 4,372 FTE
CITY-NEAR ONTARIO HUB (CAONA) 3,354 FTE
CITY-NEAR Atlantic Solutions Group Inc, Inc. DBA Empire Workforce Solutions 3,240 FTE
NAT-TCR Ridge Recyclers Incorporated 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Budrovich Contracting Co Inc. 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Baton Rouge, LA Office 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR ANR Electric LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Metro Transit Heywood Office Building & Police Department 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0072-HES Williston 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE DuPont Michigan Operations - Midland Plant 488 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington 488 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.