Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Callahan Village Assisted Living

Roseburg, OR · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Callahan Village Assisted Living runs at 147% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

Callahan Village Assisted Living: 5.6 TCR = 147% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Callahan Village Assisted Living safety composite

Callahan Village Assisted Living scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 67% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.6 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 67% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.7

2016→2022

Callahan Village Assisted Living injury rate improved

Callahan Village Assisted Living's TCR fell 11.7 from 11.9 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2020 at 16.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=11.9 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=16.4 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Roseburg, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.6 · 147% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #52/218
  • PHOTO 10959
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10959 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Callahan Village Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Callahan Village Assisted Living averages 5.6 TCR (147% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Callahan Village Assisted Living TCR series: 2016=11.9 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=5.1 · 2020=16.4 · 2021=5.6 · 2022=0.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Callahan Village Assisted Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #52 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Callahan Village Assisted Living (37 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Callahan Village Assisted Living
Callahan Village Assisted Living (37 employees, TCR 5.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Callahan Village Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.3 0.3 2 18 0
2021 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2020 16.4 16.4 7 0 0
2019 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 11.9 11.9 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Roseburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 125 employers in Roseburg, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10959 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jennings Terrace #574 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ontario 5.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR StoneBridge of Heber Sprinngs 5.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BIZON NURSERY LLC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE SNOW PEAK AREA 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Eugene RC 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE OR-Parkrose RC 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Outpatient Lab 5,503 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foundation, Community Education, Healthy Kids 1,066 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine Lab - Mercy Laboratory 1,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Evergreen Family Medicine - Mercy Imaging 1,022 FTE
NAT-TCR Deerbrook Skilled Nursing & Rehab. 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Hearthstone Communities by Heritage 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 052866-Fre-Irvington Sta 5.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 038891-Tuc-Mission Sta 5.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE HG114 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE HG392 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eclipse Transportation 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Springfield 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.