OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS · California

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE

Marysville, CA · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE runs at 82% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS workplace, earning a grade C.

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE: 3.1 TCR = 82% of OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE safety composite

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE: 0.0 → 4.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 8.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2023

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE's TCR rose 4.4 from 0.0 in 2020 to 4.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 8.0 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Marysville, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 82% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #43/107
  • PHOTO Horizons Mental Heal…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Horizons Mental Health Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE averages 3.1 TCR (82% of the OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=8 · 2023=4.4 · BLS 3.8

Where CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE falls in its industry

611 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND S establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 107 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND S employers in California.

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE (21 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE
CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE (21 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

CAMARY-AEG-MARYSVILLE has fewer employees than the OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE A median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2022 8.0 0.0 0 1 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · CA · Marysville

611 OUTPATIENT MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE CENTERS employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 39 employers in Marysville, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Horizons Mental Health Center 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAJOHN-E71-ALLIANCE JOHNSTOWN 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brighter Heights Maine 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR PAENS1-E15-ENSIGN I PITTSBURGH 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 64 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 583 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 619 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 57 2,054 FTE
NAT-TCR Advantage Tank Lines 20054 Somerset 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Johnstown #012 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Essity Operations Wausau, LLC. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Ralston Hospitality Group 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Jefferson IRA - Amityville 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Coram - Middle Country Road 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Laney Electrical Construction, Inc 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waupaca-Accent 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.