Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing · New York
Cambridge Valley Machining Inc
Cambridge, NY · ~74 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.4
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Cambridge Valley Machining Inc runs at 225% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 7.4
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 8
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Cambridge Valley Machining Inc's OSHA Total Case Rate of 7.4 to the Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (225% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). This reflects reported recordable injuries, not an independent safety inspection -- underreporting is a known limitation of employer self-recordkeeping.
Injury rate over time
Cambridge Valley Machining Inc's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Cambridge Valley Machining Inc falls in its industry
429 Ultrasonic boring, drilling, a establishmentsSafer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.
Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 20 Ultrasonic boring, drilling, a employers in New York.
Cambridge Valley Machining Inc has an average TCR of 7.4, which is 225% of the industry average (3.3) for Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing. This is significantly worse than average.
The letter grade is a transparent derived index PlainSafetyScore computes from public OSHA ITA and BLS benchmark data, not an official OSHA rating or safety certification. Full formula and thresholds: Methodology.
Trend analysis for Cambridge Valley Machining Inc
Between 2023 and 2024, Cambridge Valley Machining Inc's Total Case Rate improved from 8.3 to 6.6 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers, a 21% decrease across 1 year of OSHA reporting.
The safest year on record was 2024, at a TCR of 6.6, while 2023 saw the highest rate, at 8.3, a spread of 1.7 points between the best and worst reporting years. That's a comparatively narrow spread, suggesting a fairly consistent safety record across the 2 years with a usable rate on file, rather than one outlier year skewing the multi-year average.
Summed across those 2 reporting years, Cambridge Valley Machining Inc recorded 8 total injuries and illnesses, with no fatalities reported in any of those years. Readers comparing establishments should weigh the 2-year trend above alongside establishment size, since a larger workforce naturally accumulates more raw incidents even at a lower per-100-worker rate.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 8 injuries, 2 illnesses shown on this page for Cambridge Valley Machining Inc are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 333517 - Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2024)
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
3 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 152,533 hours worked = 3.93 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cambridge Valley Machining Inc (this establishment) | 7.41 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Sheet metal forming machines manufacturing industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 333517 |
| New York state avg (all industries) | 4.67 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Cambridge Valley Machining Inc to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2024: 5 reportable incidents · 5 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2023: 5 reportable incidents · 3 injuries, 2 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 6.6 | 3.9 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 8.3 | 3.3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Cambridge Valley Machining Inc's reported OSHA injury record versus its Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 225% of the Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing benchmark, Cambridge Valley Machining Inc reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Ultrasonic boring, drilling, and cutting machines, metalworking, manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Cambridge Valley Machining Inc's safety grade?
How many injuries has Cambridge Valley Machining Inc reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within New York, and by nearby establishments in Cambridge - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~7.4)
Similar size (~74 workers)
Explore More Safety Data
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.