Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing · California

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc.

Lake Forest, CA · ~41 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. runs at 58% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc.: 3.1 TCR = 58% of Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. safety composite

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 51% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2021→2024

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. injury rate improved

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.3 from 2.3 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 7.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Lake Forest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 58% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #9/29
  • PHOTO Android Industries
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Android Industries (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. averages 3.1 TCR (58% of the Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. TCR series: 2021=2.3 · 2022=2.6 · 2023=7.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 5.4

Where Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. falls in its industry

772 Air-conditioners, motor vehicl establishments

Safer than 51% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #9 safest of 29 Air-conditioners, motor vehicl employers in California.

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc.
Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. (41 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Camisasca Automotive Manufacturing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 7.6 0.0 3 0 0
2022 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · CA · Lake Forest

772 Air-conditioners, motor vehicle, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Android Industries 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huf North America Automotive Parts Manufacturing Corp. 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR X-Cel Industries 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Athens, AL 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE CAL-O ORGANIC FARMING ADMINISTRATION 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Lindsay 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | IEW Enterprise 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE George Jackson Farms, Inc. 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
NAT-TCR Njnew - Newark Airport 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Msjac - Jackson 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 104 Brentwood 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Beverly 5330 Gas-Ma59 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hearth & Home of Vandalia 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Braeburn Alloy Steel LLC 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE FV Clinics-Uptown 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Board of County Supervisors 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.