Computer software programming services, custom · California

Panasonic Avionics Corporation

Lake Forest, CA · ~2,047 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Panasonic Avionics Corporation runs at 84% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Computer software programming services, custom workplace, earning a grade C.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation: 0.4 TCR = 84% of Computer software programming services, custom BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Panasonic Avionics Corporation safety composite

Panasonic Avionics Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 0.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Panasonic Avionics Corporation held a steady TCR band

Panasonic Avionics Corporation's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.4 in 2018 to 0.5 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.14× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541511 · Lake Forest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade C · TCR 0.4 · 84% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #12/22
  • PHOTO Skyward, Inc.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~2,047 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Skyward, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Panasonic Avionics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Panasonic Avionics Corporation averages 0.4 TCR (84% of the Computer software programming services, custom BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Panasonic Avionics Corporation TCR series: 2018=0.4 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.5 · BLS 0.5

Where Panasonic Avionics Corporation falls in its industry

90 Computer software programming establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 22 Computer software programming employers in California.

Panasonic Avionics Corporation (2,047 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 324 employees and a TCR of 0.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Panasonic Avionics Corporation
Panasonic Avionics Corporation (2,047 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 324 employees and a TCR of 0.4

Panasonic Avionics Corporation has more employees than the Computer software programming services, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.5 0.1 7 1 0
2019 0.5 0.0 10 0 0
2018 0.4 0.2 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541511 · CA · Lake Forest

90 Computer software programming services, custom employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Skyward, Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAI - Newark, DE Employees 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR UPS TECHNOLOGY HEADQUARTERS & DATACENTER (NJRAR) 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR IT Gov Plaza 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 73 2,050 FTE
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 81 2,050 FTE
STATE-SIZE Department of State Hospitals-Coalinga 2,050 FTE
STATE-SIZE Good Samaritan Hospital 2,042 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest 598 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Golf Properties 591 FTE
NAT-TCR PSC Industrial Outsourcing, LP-EPE 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Dolben Company Inc. 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TEXAS 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation Headquarters 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Winnebago Industries - Forest City 2,047 FTE
NAT-SIZE Power Design Inc 2,047 FTE
NAT-SIZE Falcon Healthcare Inc DBA Interim Healthcare 2,046 FTE
NAT-SIZE Blount Memorial Hospital 2,046 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.