District and regional offices · California

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest

Lake Forest, CA · ~598 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.1
Avg TCR
0.7
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest runs at 17% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical District and regional offices workplace, earning a grade A.

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest: 0.1 TCR = 17% of District and regional offices BLS 0.7 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest safety composite

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest held a steady TCR band

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest's TCR held near 0.2 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.2 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.2 TCR. In 2022, DART was 1.83× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 551114 · Lake Forest, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.1 · 17% of ind

  • DART 0.2 DART
  • RANK #8/183
  • PHOTO General Mills (Corpo…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~598 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: General Mills (Corporate) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest averages 0.1 TCR (17% of the District and regional offices BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.1 · 2020=0 · 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · BLS 0.7

Where Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest falls in its industry

1,475 District and regional offices establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 183 District and regional offices employers in California.

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest (598 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest
Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest (598 employees, TCR 0.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 189 employees and a TCR of 0.7

Spectrum Brands, Lake Forest has more employees than the District and regional offices median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 0.2 0.2 2 0 0
2021 0.1 0.1 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.1 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.2 0.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

551114 · CA · Lake Forest

1,475 District and regional offices employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 90 employers in Lake Forest, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR General Mills (Corporate) 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR American & Efird Customer Service Center 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial SE Field Employees 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sasol Chemicals Corporate Office 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE California Department of Transportation Facility 38 597 FTE
STATE-SIZE LARGO CONCRETE, INC. 599 FTE
STATE-SIZE Webcor Craft L.P 599 FTE
STATE-SIZE Torrance Refinery 597 FTE
CITY-NEAR Panasonic Avionics Corporation 2,047 FTE
CITY-NEAR ARB, Inc. 1,334 FTE
CITY-NEAR ASSA ABLOY Americas Residential, Inc., Lake Forest 594 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Golf Properties 591 FTE
NAT-TCR Alcon Johns Creek Research and Development 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Clmamdhs - at&T Tech Srvcs Company Inc 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TXAU41 0.1 TCR
NAT-TCR IES Communications, LLC - Division Support 0.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE 3rd Street Building 598 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6458-ZECL 598 FTE
NAT-SIZE USJT Ingram Micro Inc Jonestown 598 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABS Global 598 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.