Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Camp Hill Plant

Camp Hill, PA · ~54 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Camp Hill Plant runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Camp Hill Plant: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Camp Hill Plant safety composite

Camp Hill Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 27%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

51/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 27% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Camp Hill Plant held a steady TCR band

Camp Hill Plant's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.4 in 2016 to 4.5 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.49× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=1.3 · 2021=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Camp Hill, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #6/24
  • PHOTO Elkhart Pouring Plant
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Elkhart Pouring Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Camp Hill Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Camp Hill Plant averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Camp Hill Plant TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=1.3 · 2021=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Camp Hill Plant falls in its industry

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 24 Cushions, carpet and rug, uret employers in Pennsylvania.

Camp Hill Plant (54 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Camp Hill Plant
Camp Hill Plant (54 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Camp Hill Plant has fewer employees than the Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and o median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.5 3.0 3 0 0
2019 1.3 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.4 2.2 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · PA · Camp Hill

474 Cushions, carpet and rug, urethane and other foam plastics (except polystrene), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 107 employers in Camp Hill, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Elkhart Pouring Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Interstate Foam & Supply, Inc. Plant 4 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake City (BP) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fagerdala/Sealed Air-Indianna 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRIPLE-M-FARMS 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scrubgrass Reclamation Company L.P. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 269-NiSource-Washington PA-Service 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagman Construction Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR A109 - Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center 1,965 FTE
CITY-NEAR HOLY SPIRIT HOSPITAL 1,723 FTE
CITY-NEAR Harrisburg 1,056 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vantage Foods PA LP 660 FTE
NAT-TCR Kleer Lumber 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 154 Seattle Gallery 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shackleford 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR TML Construction, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meadow Ridge Farms Inc. 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stoney Creek Investors of Independence, LLC 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE DENSO Products & Services Americas, Inc, JVWH 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wild By Nature Co., Inc. 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.