Polyurethane foam products manufacturing · Indiana

Elkhart Pouring Plant

Elkhart, IN · ~313 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Elkhart Pouring Plant runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Polyurethane foam products manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Elkhart Pouring Plant: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Elkhart Pouring Plant safety composite

Elkhart Pouring Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2016→2024

Elkhart Pouring Plant injury rate improved

Elkhart Pouring Plant's TCR fell 1.2 from 3.1 in 2016 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3.0 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326150 · Elkhart, IN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #10/37
  • PHOTO Interstate Foam & Su…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~313 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Interstate Foam & Supply, Inc. Plant 4 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Elkhart Pouring Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Elkhart Pouring Plant averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Elkhart Pouring Plant TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.2 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.7 · 2022=1.1 · 2023=3 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Elkhart Pouring Plant falls in its industry

474 Polyurethane foam products man establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 37 Polyurethane foam products man employers in Indiana.

Elkhart Pouring Plant (313 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Elkhart Pouring Plant
Elkhart Pouring Plant (313 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Elkhart Pouring Plant has more employees than the Polyurethane foam products manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 5 0 0
2023 3.0 2.6 7 0 0
2022 1.1 0.0 3 0 0
2021 1.7 0.0 5 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 3 0 0
2019 1.4 0.0 4 0 0
2018 2.2 0.3 6 1 0
2017 2.8 1.4 10 0 0
2016 3.1 1.1 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326150 · IN · Elkhart

474 Polyurethane foam products manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 401 employers in Elkhart, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Interstate Foam & Supply, Inc. Plant 4 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Camp Hill Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Salt Lake City (BP) 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fagerdala/Sealed Air-Indianna 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE GFD - Avery Dennison 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1445 - Mishawaka 313 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tate and Lyle Ingredients 314 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milestone AV Techonologies - DaLite Warsaw 312 FTE
CITY-NEAR Forest River, Inc. 12,549 FTE
CITY-NEAR THOR MOTOR COACH 2,437 FTE
CITY-NEAR Elkhart Community Schools 1,892 FTE
CITY-NEAR HRV LLC 1,692 FTE
NAT-TCR Titan Pro SCI, Inc. - Main 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Abc Manufacturing 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Manor West 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Holiday Inn Florida 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE KYTC District 12 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Parks & Recreation 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Winder 313 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carilion Clinic Giles Community Hospital Co. 04 313 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.