Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Washington

Canterbury Gardens

Longview, WA · ~76 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
26.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Canterbury Gardens runs at 708% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Canterbury Gardens: 26.9 TCR = 708% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Canterbury Gardens safety composite

Canterbury Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 26.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−52.1

2019→2024

Canterbury Gardens injury rate improved

Canterbury Gardens's TCR fell 52.1 from 52.5 in 2019 to 0.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 102.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=52.5 · 2020=46.2 · 2021=29.0 · 2022=102.1 · 2023=31.9 · 2024=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Longview, WA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 26.9 · 708% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #108/109
  • PHOTO The Residence at Ced…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 50 inj
  • SIZE ~76 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Residence at Cedar Dell (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Canterbury Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Canterbury Gardens averages 26.9 TCR (708% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Canterbury Gardens TCR series: 2019=52.5 · 2020=46.2 · 2021=29 · 2022=102.1 · 2023=31.9 · 2024=0.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Canterbury Gardens falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 109 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Washington.

Canterbury Gardens (76 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Canterbury Gardens
Canterbury Gardens (76 employees, TCR 26.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Canterbury Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.5 0.5 2 12 0
2023 31.9 28.4 3 15 0
2022 102.1 96.5 2 53 0
2021 29.0 25.1 1 14 0
2020 46.2 25.9 14 11 0
2019 52.5 13.1 28 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · WA · Longview

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 101 employers in Longview, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Residence at Cedar Dell 26.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Fallbrook 26.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Villa 27.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vintage Knolls 26.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE G&G ORCHARDS INC. 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Big Mountain Enterprises, LLC 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arrow Concrete & Asphalt Specialties LLC 76 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bergelectric Corp. WA 76 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCR Delaware Campus 1,550 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Kelly, LLC. 1,059 FTE
CITY-NEAR JH Kelly All States 910 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4532 Longview Paper Mill 761 FTE
NAT-TCR South Holland Manor Hrc 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR The Eye Surgery Center of the Carolinas 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZHAY 26.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Extreme Delivery Services LLC 26.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brandywine Living at Mountain Ridge 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ep Watermark Br LLC 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE B&G Supply Co., Inc. 76 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Valley Almond Company 76 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.