Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard · Utah

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant

Salt Lake City, UT · ~34 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant safety composite

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.6

2016→2019

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant injury rate improved

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant's TCR fell 2.6 from 2.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2016 at 2.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=2.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Salt Lake City, UT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P95
  • PHOTO Huhtamaki Inc.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huhtamaki Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Utah employers → · Look up another →

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant TCR series: 2016=2.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant falls in its industry

140 Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfib establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant
Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant (34 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant has fewer employees than the Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 2.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · UT · Salt Lake City

140 Cores (i.e., all-fiber, nonfiber ends of any material), fiber, made from purchased paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 3,861 rated employers in Utah with headcount on file · 998 employers in Salt Lake City, UT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tetra Pak Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki De Soto 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki De Soto 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ruvica Builders, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE RJT Excavating Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE HDD Willco, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Deseret Meat 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - SLC 4,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR PC - Primary Childrens Hospital 3,254 FTE
CITY-NEAR L3 Technologies, Inc. 3,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Salt Lake City Terminal 2,766 FTE
NAT-TCR Reelfoot Manor Health & Rehab 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Lynn Haven, FL-USA 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Ep Doubletree Westminster LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Chicago MOD 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Graphics Group 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stericycle Environmental Solutions - San Jose,CA 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maag Automatik, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Recommunity Morris 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.