Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard · Texas

Tetra Pak Inc.

Denton, TX · ~344 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Tetra Pak Inc. runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade A.

Tetra Pak Inc.: 0.7 TCR = 20% of Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Tetra Pak Inc. safety composite

Tetra Pak Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Tetra Pak Inc.: 0.6 → 1.0 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 1.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.39× in 2024

Tetra Pak Inc.'s TCR rose 0.4 from 0.6 in 2016 to 1.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 1.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322219 · Denton, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #1/8
  • PHOTO Huhtamaki Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 16 inj
  • SIZE ~344 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huhtamaki Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Tetra Pak Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Tetra Pak Inc. averages 0.7 TCR (20% of the Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Tetra Pak Inc. TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0.3 · 2018=0.6 · 2019=0.4 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.9 · 2024=1 · BLS 3.3

Where Tetra Pak Inc. falls in its industry

140 Food containers, sanitary (exc establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 8 Food containers, sanitary (exc employers in Texas.

Tetra Pak Inc. (344 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Tetra Pak Inc.
Tetra Pak Inc. (344 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 67 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Tetra Pak Inc. has more employees than the Food containers, sanitary (except foldin median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.0 0.3 2 2 0
2023 0.9 0.3 1 2 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2021 0.7 0.7 2 0 0
2020 1.1 0.4 3 0 0
2019 0.4 0.0 1 0 0
2018 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2017 0.3 0.2 2 0 0
2016 0.6 0.3 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322219 · TX · Denton

140 Food containers, sanitary (except folding), made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 211 employers in Denton, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Caraustar Salt Lake City Tube Plant 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki De Soto 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Huhtamaki De Soto 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sidewinder Drilling 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vernor Material & Equipment Co. 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE GEODynamics 344 FTE
STATE-SIZE 404 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Paccar 2,843 FTE
CITY-NEAR Peterbilt Motors Company 2,095 FTE
CITY-NEAR Texas Health Denton 1,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR 060 Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton 1,040 FTE
NAT-TCR Winston Steel, LLC - Log Cabin 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Leeda Northeast Portage 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Barr Laboratories, Inc., (subsidiary of Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Rivet Roof Services Corporation 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE WR Grace & Co. Inc 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indiana Convention Center / Lucas Oil Stadium 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cherrylake Main Office 344 FTE
NAT-SIZE Afton Chemical Corporation - Sauget, IL 344 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.